Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 00:53

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
SpaceX May Be Failing to Get Starship Working at All - futurism.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Have you ever been forced into bestiality?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
A New Study Finds What Happens When You Drink Coffee Every Day - AOL.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What can I say to a scammer who thinks he loves me, but I don't want to be scammed?
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Satellite streaks block out the Arctic sky photo of the day for June 20, 2025 - Space
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
2 Minnesota lawmakers shot in apparent 'targeted' incident: Officials - ABC News
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Would you let your partner cheat on you every now and again?